Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMAX
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMAX
FSSNX vs WMMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and WMMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. WMMAX (205M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMAX: FSSNX (0.92) vs WMMAX (0.40). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMAX: FSSNX (15 years) vs WMMAX (25 years). WMMAX (1.53) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WMMAX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMAX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.83 vs. WMMAX (14.93). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 34.97 vs. WMMAX (-42.79).
| FSSNX | WMMAX | FSSNX / WMMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.53 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.53 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.759 | 26.136 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 205M | 16,585% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.40 | 226% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.83 | 14.93 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.45 | -14.04 | -516% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.97 | -42.79 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 169.50 | -22.51 | -753% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers