Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.86
Change+$0.27 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.35
Change+$0.03 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets200.54M
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. WMMCX (201M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs WMMCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.06 vs. WMMCX (-19.63). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 56.39 vs. WMMCX (-29.85).
| FSSNX | WMMCX | FSSNX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.325 | 3.879 | -8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 201M | 12,736% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.06 | -19.63 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.68 | -26.20 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.39 | -29.85 | -189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.68 | -42.67 | -168% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers