Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.72
Change-$0.08 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.89B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.31
Change-$0.05 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.4M
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. WMMCX (197M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FSSNX (0.90) vs WMMCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). WMMCX (10.95) and FSSNX (10.79) have marching annual gain over last year. FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 47.93 vs. WMMCX (-34.87).
| FSSNX | WMMCX | FSSNX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.434 | 4.216 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 197M | 13,147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.79 | 10.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.06 | -31.82 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | -34.87 | -137% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.21 | -40.61 | -195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement