Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.26
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.09B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$11.97
Change+$0.06 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets225.77M
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.1B vs. WMMCX (226M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FSSNX (1.36) vs WMMCX (0.29). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FSSNX (13 years) vs WMMCX (23 years). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.08 vs. WMMCX (-13.20). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. WMMCX (-45.46).
| FSSNX | WMMCX | FSSNX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.095 | 0.927 | 226% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.1B | 226M | 11,991% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.29 | 468% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.08 | -13.20 | -152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.99 | -40.01 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | -45.46 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.83 | -41.84 | -215% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...