Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$31.18
Change+$0.32 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.42B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.94
Change+$0.08 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets197.44M
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 28.4B vs. WMMCX (197M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FSSNX (0.82) vs WMMCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.73 vs. WMMCX (9.35). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 56.96 vs. WMMCX (-33.90).
| FSSNX | WMMCX | FSSNX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.488 | 8.432 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 197M | 14,416% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.73 | 9.35 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.49 | -18.64 | -276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.96 | -33.90 | -168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.00 | -36.75 | -294% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement