Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$29.20
Change-$0.35 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.37
Change-$0.10 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMCX commentary
Dec 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 29.5B vs. WMMCX (249M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FSSNX (1.36) vs WMMCX (0.29). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FSSNX (13 years) vs WMMCX (23 years). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.49 vs. WMMCX (-11.83). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.38 vs. WMMCX (-42.11).
| FSSNX | WMMCX | FSSNX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.770 | -14.631 | -115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.5B | 249M | 11,847% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.29 | 468% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.49 | -11.83 | -165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.65 | -38.31 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.38 | -42.11 | -110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.42 | -41.12 | -220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...