Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.78
Change-$0.41 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$12.23
Change-$0.08 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMCX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongSell and WMMCX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 26.9B vs. WMMCX (254M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FSSNX (1.36) vs WMMCX (0.29). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FSSNX (13 years) vs WMMCX (23 years). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.85 vs. WMMCX (-4.82). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 47.46 vs. WMMCX (-43.87).
| FSSNX | WMMCX | FSSNX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.090 | -15.597 | -97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.9B | 254M | 10,591% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.29 | 468% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.85 | -4.82 | -660% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.14 | -52.36 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.46 | -43.87 | -108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.44 | -42.53 | -208% |