Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$23.84
Change+$1.90 (+8.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.17B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$10.54
Change+$0.61 (+6.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.1M
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.2B vs. WMMCX (172M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FSSNX (1.13) vs WMMCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). WMMCX (2.25) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.11 vs. WMMCX (-32.77). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 47.63 vs. WMMCX (-36.54).
| FSSNX | WMMCX | FSSNX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.25 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.737 | -16.273 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.2B | 172M | 14,070% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.11 | -32.77 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.29 | -46.29 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.63 | -36.54 | -130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.88 | -54.26 | -66% |