Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.28
Change-$0.83 (-2.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.16B
TETON Westwood Mighty Mites C
Price$11.84
Change-$0.23 (-1.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.02M
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and WMMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. WMMCX (214M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FSSNX (1.36) vs WMMCX (0.29). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FSSNX (13 years) vs WMMCX (24 years). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 9.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.61 vs. WMMCX (-16.15). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. WMMCX (-45.05).
| FSSNX | WMMCX | FSSNX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.445 | -0.169 | 857% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2B | 214M | 12,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.29 | 468% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.61 | -16.15 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.37 | -37.15 | -44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.70 | -45.05 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.57 | -44.07 | -167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...