Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs WMMCX
FSSNX vs WMMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. WMMCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Buy and WMMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34B vs. WMMCX (197M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than WMMCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs WMMCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than WMMCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs WMMCX (25 years). WMMCX (2.28) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). FSSNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. WMMCX (2.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMMCX: FSSNX (0) vs WMMCX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.28 vs. WMMCX (12.39). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. WMMCX (-50.01).
| FSSNX | WMMCX | FSSNX / WMMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.28 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 2.28 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.653 | 19.757 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34B | 197M | 17,259% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.28 | 12.39 | 341% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.93 | -19.59 | -336% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.58 | -50.01 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.07 | -36.82 | -410% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement