Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs ZSCCX
FSSNX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs ZSCCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$28.03
Change-$0.17 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.56B
FSSNX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and ZSCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. ZSCCX (28.6M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: FSSNX (0.92) vs ZSCCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZSCCX: FSSNX (0) vs ZSCCX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.18 vs. ZSCCX (-16.69). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. ZSCCX (46.17).
| FSSNX | ZSCCX | FSSNX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.39 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.71 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.879 | 0.588 | 320% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.6B | 28.6M | 89,510% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.18 | -16.69 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.05 | 8.90 | 405% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.85 | 46.17 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.38 | 23.64 | 323% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement