Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs ZSCCX
FSSNX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs ZSCCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$26.70
Change-$0.31 (-1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.88B
FSSNX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a StrongBuy and ZSCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 24.9B vs. ZSCCX (28M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: FSSNX (1.10) vs ZSCCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: FSSNX (14 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 135.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZSCCX: FSSNX (0) vs ZSCCX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.48 vs. ZSCCX (-12.43). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 61.92 vs. ZSCCX (52.71).
| FSSNX | ZSCCX | FSSNX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.39 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.71 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.540 | -2.449 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.9B | 28M | 88,929% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.48 | -12.43 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.58 | 4.08 | 652% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.92 | 52.71 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.93 | 21.46 | 321% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement