Ad is loading...
FSSNX vs ZSCCX
FSSNX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs ZSCCX
Fidelity Small Cap Index
Price$27.28
Change-$0.83 (-2.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.16B
FSSNX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and ZSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. ZSCCX (30.3M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: FSSNX (1.36) vs ZSCCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: FSSNX (13 years) vs ZSCCX (14 years). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. FSSNX (9.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZSCCX: FSSNX (0) vs ZSCCX (2500). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.98 vs. ZSCCX (-9.33). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 40.86 vs. ZSCCX (16.44).
| FSSNX | ZSCCX | FSSNX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.553 | 0.947 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.2B | 30.3M | 89,769% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.36 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.98 | -9.33 | -150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.91 | -1.30 | -1,530% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.86 | 16.44 | 249% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.85 | 31.26 | 252% |