Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs ZSCCX
FSSNX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs ZSCCX
FSSNX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and ZSCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. ZSCCX (35.7M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: FSSNX (1.06) vs ZSCCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs ZSCCX (15 years). ZSCCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZSCCX: FSSNX (0) vs ZSCCX (2500). ZSCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.63 vs. FSSNX (34.31). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. ZSCCX (28.15).
| FSSNX | ZSCCX | FSSNX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.40 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.76 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.919 | 23.075 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.1B | 35.7M | 95,518% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.31 | 36.63 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.64 | 20.93 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.13 | 28.15 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 146.34 | 75.11 | 195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers