Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSNX vs ZSCCX
FSSNX vs ZSCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSSNX vs ZSCCX
FSSNX vs ZSCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSNX vs. ZSCCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSNX is a Hold and ZSCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.9B vs. ZSCCX (36.2M). FSSNX pays higher dividends than ZSCCX: FSSNX (1.02) vs ZSCCX (0.00). FSSNX was incepted earlier than ZSCCX: FSSNX (15 years) vs ZSCCX (15 years). ZSCCX (1.76) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). ZSCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZSCCX: FSSNX (0) vs ZSCCX (2500). ZSCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.29 vs. FSSNX (35.03). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 41.83 vs. ZSCCX (34.25).
| FSSNX | ZSCCX | FSSNX / ZSCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.40 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.76 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.765 | 26.244 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.9B | 36.2M | 96,409% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.03 | 38.29 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.18 | 27.45 | 223% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.83 | 34.25 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.70 | 76.88 | 195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers