Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSRX vs WCMLX
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMLX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R
Price$21.24
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.49B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.89
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.16M
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.49B vs. WCMLX (44.2M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSRX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.34). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSRX (16.31). FSSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FSSRX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.91 vs. FSSRX (4.54). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 16.12 vs. FSSRX (-11.96).
| FSSRX | WCMLX | FSSRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.79 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.581 | 8.087 | 20% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.49B | 44.2M | 5,627% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.54 | 4.91 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.78 | 36.54 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.96 | 16.12 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement