Ad is loading...
FSSRX vs WCMLX
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMLX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R
Price$17.96
Change+$0.47 (+2.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.2B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.28
Change+$0.27 (+2.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.35M
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.2B vs. WCMLX (39.3M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSRX (23 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.34). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSSRX (15.99). FSSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FSSRX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). FSSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.97 vs. WCMLX (-10.85). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 25.40 vs. FSSRX (4.86).
| FSSRX | WCMLX | FSSRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.86 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.195 | -14.386 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 39.3M | 5,588% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.97 | -10.85 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.28 | -5.33 | -43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.86 | 25.40 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers