Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSRX vs WCMLX
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMLX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R
Price$19.90
Change+$0.16 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.43B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.40
Change+$0.16 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.48M
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.43B vs. WCMLX (41.5M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSRX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.34). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSRX (15.99). FSSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FSSRX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). FSSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.72 vs. WCMLX (-0.65). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.28 vs. FSSRX (-3.75).
| FSSRX | WCMLX | FSSRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.79 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.414 | -4.821 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.43B | 41.5M | 5,858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.72 | -0.65 | -727% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.38 | 17.69 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.75 | 22.28 | -17% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement