Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSRX vs WCMLX
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMLX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R
Price$20.82
Change+$0.13 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.37B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. WCMLX (41.3M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSRX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.29). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSRX (16.31). FSSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FSSRX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.04 vs. FSSRX (-3.86). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. FSSRX (-20.45).
| FSSRX | WCMLX | FSSRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.79 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.862 | 1.788 | -48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.38B | 41.3M | 5,751% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.86 | -3.04 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.75 | 21.43 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.45 | -0.83 | 2,454% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.71 | N/A | - |