Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSRX vs WCMLX
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMLX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R
Price$20.82
Change+$0.23 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.48B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.61
Change+$0.07 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.48B vs. WCMLX (44.8M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSRX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.34). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSRX (16.31). FSSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FSSRX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). FSSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. WCMLX (3.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 16.52 vs. FSSRX (-11.25).
| FSSRX | WCMLX | FSSRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.79 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.342 | 5.288 | -25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.48B | 44.8M | 5,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 3.52 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.01 | 20.57 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.25 | 16.52 | -68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement