Ad is loading...
FSSRX vs WCMLX
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMLX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R
Price$16.39
Change-$0.85 (-4.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.31
Change-$0.50 (-4.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.5M
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.18B vs. WCMLX (38.5M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSRX (23 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.34). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSSRX (15.99). FSSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FSSRX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). FSSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.52 vs. WCMLX (-9.95). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 62.99 vs. FSSRX (34.15).
| FSSRX | WCMLX | FSSRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.99 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.86 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.973 | -9.253 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 38.5M | 5,652% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.52 | -9.95 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.03 | -6.42 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.15 | 62.99 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...