Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSRX vs WCMLX
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMLX
FSSRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.48B vs. WCMLX (52.4M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: FSSRX (24 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.29). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FSSRX (16.31). FSSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: FSSRX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.84 vs. FSSRX (15.48). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. FSSRX (-16.24).
| FSSRX | WCMLX | FSSRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.79 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.706 | 9.375 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.48B | 52.4M | 4,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 25.84 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.38 | 32.13 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.24 | -0.07 | 24,461% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement