Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSRX vs WCMNX
FSSRX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMNX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R
Price$19.90
Change+$0.16 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.43B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.23
Change+$0.16 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.48M
FSSRX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Buy and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.43B vs. WCMNX (41.5M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FSSRX (24 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.34). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSRX (15.99). FSSRX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.72 vs. WCMNX (-0.90). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 20.82 vs. FSSRX (-3.75).
| FSSRX | WCMNX | FSSRX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.24 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.04 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.414 | -4.886 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.43B | 41.5M | 5,858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.72 | -0.90 | -523% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.38 | 16.84 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.75 | 20.82 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement