Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSRX vs WCMNX
FSSRX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMNX
Franklin Small Cap Growth R
Price$20.82
Change+$0.23 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.48B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.41
Change+$0.06 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
FSSRX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMNX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.48B vs. WCMNX (44.8M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FSSRX (24 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.34). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FSSRX (16.31). FSSRX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. WCMNX (3.33). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 15.09 vs. FSSRX (-11.25).
| FSSRX | WCMNX | FSSRX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.24 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 2.04 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.342 | 5.201 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.48B | 44.8M | 5,542% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 3.33 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.01 | 19.73 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.25 | 15.09 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.13 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers