Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSRX vs WCMNX
FSSRX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts FSSRX vs WCMNX
FSSRX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSRX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSRX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSRX has more cash in the bank: 2.48B vs. WCMNX (53.1M). FSSRX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . FSSRX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: FSSRX (24 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than FSSRX (1.29). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FSSRX (16.31). FSSRX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.42 vs. FSSRX (15.48). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -1.40 vs. FSSRX (-16.24).
| FSSRX | WCMNX | FSSRX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.24 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 2.04 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.706 | 9.225 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.48B | 53.1M | 4,678% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.48 | 25.42 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.38 | 31.21 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.24 | -1.40 | 1,161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement