FSSZX
Price
$51.07
Change
+$0.25 (+0.49%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
7.36B
FTHFX
Price
$59.68
Change
+$0.20 (+0.34%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
12.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSSZX vs FTHFX

FSSZX vs FTHFX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 9.76B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 7.36B to 12.15B. FTHFX holds the highest valuation in this group at 12.15B. The lowest valued company is FSSZX at 7.36B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -0%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was -3%, and the average quarterly price growth was 15%. FTHFX experienced the highest price growth at 0%, while FSSZX experienced the biggest fall at -0%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
VS
FSSZX vs. FTHFX commentary
Sep 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSZX is a StrongBuy and FTHFX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTHFX has more cash in the bank: 12.1B vs. FSSZX (7.36B). FTHFX pays higher dividends than FSSZX: FTHFX (0.56) vs FSSZX (0.38). FSSZX was incepted earlier than FTHFX: FSSZX (10 years) vs FTHFX (15 years). FSSZX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FTHFX (0.64). FSSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FTHFX (28.00). FSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FTHFX: FSSZX (0) vs FTHFX (1000000). FSSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.47 vs. FTHFX (19.34). FTHFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.53 vs. FSSZX (39.54).
FSSZXFTHFXFSSZX / FTHFX
Total Expense Ratio0.730.64114%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio0.730.64114%
Fund Existence10 years15 years-
Gain YTD19.60517.526112%
Front LoadN/AN/A-
Min. Initial Investment01000000-
Min. Initial Investment IRAN/AN/A-
Net Assets7.36B12.1B61%
Annual Yield % from dividends0.380.5668%
Returns for 1 year26.4719.34137%
Returns for 3 years65.9860.60109%
Returns for 5 years39.5460.5365%
Returns for 10 yearsN/A233.87-
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSNYX69.77N/A
N/A
Victory Global Energy Transition Y
JIGHX39.44N/A
N/A
JHancock International Growth NAV
PKAIX18.85N/A
N/A
PIMCO RAE US Instl
CMIRX10.39N/A
N/A
Conestoga Discovery Institutional
CAGEX19.60-0.02
-0.10%
Calamos Global Equity A