Ad is loading...
FSSZX vs NAESX
FSSZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSSZX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp Z
Price$34.62
Change-$0.09 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.6B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$107.00
Change-$0.04 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
FSSZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSZX vs. NAESX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSZX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. FSSZX (4.6B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSSZX: NAESX (1.43) vs FSSZX (1.07). FSSZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSSZX (8 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSSZX (0.76) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSSZX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.34 vs. FSSZX (-4.60). NAESX (67.63) and FSSZX (64.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSSZX | NAESX | FSSZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.17 | 447% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.17 | 447% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.458 | -6.997 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.6B | 140B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.43 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.60 | 0.34 | -1,334% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.87 | 22.70 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.96 | 67.63 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers