Ad is loading...
FSSZX vs NAESX
FSSZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSSZX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp Z
Price$32.15
Change+$0.25 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.7B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$99.26
Change+$0.85 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
FSSZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSZX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSZX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. FSSZX (4.7B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSSZX: NAESX (1.39) vs FSSZX (1.06). FSSZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSSZX (8 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSSZX (0.76) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). FSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSSZX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.42 vs. FSSZX (-5.96). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 66.71 vs. FSSZX (61.77).
| FSSZX | NAESX | FSSZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.17 | 447% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.17 | 447% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.729 | -14.464 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 143B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.39 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.96 | -2.42 | 246% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.09 | 0.49 | 1,253% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.77 | 66.71 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.20 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...