Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSZX vs NAESX
FSSZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSSZX vs NAESX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp Z
Price$40.40
Change-$0.50 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.27B
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$122.38
Change-$1.27 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.26B
FSSZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSZX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSZX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 161B vs. FSSZX (5.27B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSSZX: NAESX (1.20) vs FSSZX (0.91). FSSZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSSZX (9 years) vs NAESX (65 years). FSSZX (0.76) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). FSSZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: FSSZX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.21 vs. FSSZX (8.52). NAESX (70.59) and FSSZX (70.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSSZX | NAESX | FSSZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.17 | 447% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.17 | 447% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.993 | 6.442 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.27B | 161B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.20 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.52 | 13.21 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.15 | 35.98 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.04 | 70.59 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 131.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement