Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSSZX vs NAESX
FSSZX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSSZX vs NAESX
FSSZX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSSZX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSSZX is a StrongBuy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. FSSZX (7.04B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSSZX: NAESX (1.08) vs FSSZX (0.39). FSSZX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSSZX (9 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FSSZX (0.73) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSSZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FSSZX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSSZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.63 vs. NAESX (28.95). FSSZX return over 5 years is better than : 41.24 vs. NAESX (33.38).
| FSSZX | NAESX | FSSZX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.17 | 429% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.17 | 429% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.039 | 13.680 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.04B | 177B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.08 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.63 | 28.95 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.38 | 54.86 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.24 | 33.38 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 160.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement