Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTBX vs RIRBX
FSTBX vs RIRBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTBX vs RIRBX
FSTBX vs RIRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTBX vs. RIRBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTBX is a StrongBuy and RIRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRBX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FSTBX (285M). RIRBX (1.96) and FSTBX (1.89) have matching dividends . FSTBX was incepted earlier than RIRBX: FSTBX (58 years) vs RIRBX (24 years). FSTBX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RIRBX (1.35). FSTBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RIRBX (50.00). RIRBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTBX: RIRBX (250) vs FSTBX (1500). FSTBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. RIRBX (6.78). RIRBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.62 vs. FSTBX (10.25).
| FSTBX | RIRBX | FSTBX / RIRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.35 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 1.35 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.514 | 9.054 | 94% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285M | 131B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.89 | 1.96 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 6.78 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.99 | 41.10 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.25 | 34.62 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.32 | 63.19 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement