Ad is loading...
FSTBX vs RIRCX
FSTBX vs RIRCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTBX vs RIRCX
Federated Hermes Global Allocation A
Price$20.01
Change+$0.24 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets258.85M
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R3
Price$71.48
Change+$0.74 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.13B
FSTBX vs RIRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTBX vs. RIRCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTBX is a Buy and RIRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. FSTBX (259M). RIRCX pays higher dividends than FSTBX: RIRCX (2.84) vs FSTBX (2.06). FSTBX was incepted earlier than RIRCX: FSTBX (56 years) vs RIRCX (23 years). FSTBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RIRCX (0.91). RIRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTBX: RIRCX (250) vs FSTBX (1500). RIRCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.36 vs. FSTBX (5.70). RIRCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.14 vs. FSTBX (20.70).
| FSTBX | RIRCX | FSTBX / RIRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 56 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.371 | 4.175 | -33% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 259M | 107B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 2.84 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.70 | 10.36 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.87 | 14.63 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.70 | 45.14 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.14 | 32.51 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...