Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTBX vs RIRCX
FSTBX vs RIRCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTBX vs RIRCX
Federated Hermes Global Allocation A
Price$21.80
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets276.8M
American Funds Capital Income Bldr R3
Price$77.48
Change+$0.14 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.75B
FSTBX vs RIRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTBX vs. RIRCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTBX is a StrongBuy and RIRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FSTBX (277M). RIRCX pays higher dividends than FSTBX: RIRCX (2.70) vs FSTBX (2.04). FSTBX was incepted earlier than RIRCX: FSTBX (57 years) vs RIRCX (23 years). FSTBX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RIRCX (0.91). FSTBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. RIRCX (56.00). RIRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTBX: RIRCX (250) vs FSTBX (1500). RIRCX (14.13) and FSTBX (13.68) have marching annual gain over last year. RIRCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.31 vs. FSTBX (15.58).
| FSTBX | RIRCX | FSTBX / RIRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 57 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.025 | 13.530 | 67% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 277M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.04 | 2.70 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.68 | 14.13 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.92 | 30.45 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.58 | 46.31 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.38 | 50.19 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement