Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTBX vs RIRCX
FSTBX vs RIRCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTBX vs RIRCX
FSTBX vs RIRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTBX vs. RIRCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTBX is a StrongBuy and RIRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIRCX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. FSTBX (289M). RIRCX pays higher dividends than FSTBX: RIRCX (2.38) vs FSTBX (1.92). FSTBX was incepted earlier than RIRCX: FSTBX (58 years) vs RIRCX (24 years). FSTBX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RIRCX (0.91). FSTBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. RIRCX (50.00). RIRCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTBX: RIRCX (250) vs FSTBX (1500). FSTBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.17 vs. RIRCX (11.48). RIRCX return over 5 years is better than : 39.92 vs. FSTBX (12.99).
| FSTBX | RIRCX | FSTBX / RIRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.91 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.91 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.656 | 11.301 | 85% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 289M | 130B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.38 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.17 | 11.48 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.92 | 46.69 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.99 | 39.92 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.23 | 66.47 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement