Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTCX vs FWRLX
FSTCX vs FWRLX Comparison
Open Charts FSTCX vs FWRLX
FSTCX vs FWRLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTCX vs. FWRLX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTCX is a Hold and FWRLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWRLX has more cash in the bank: 385M vs. FSTCX (260M). FSTCX pays higher dividends than FWRLX: FSTCX (2.35) vs FWRLX (2.09). FSTCX was incepted earlier than FWRLX: FSTCX (41 years) vs FWRLX (26 years). FSTCX (0.74) and FWRLX (0.71) have similar cost to investors . FSTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FWRLX (58.00). FSTCX (0) and FWRLX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSTCX (500) and FWRLX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FWRLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.81 vs. FSTCX (15.57). FWRLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.58 vs. FSTCX (7.13).
| FSTCX | FWRLX | FSTCX / FWRLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.71 | 104% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.71 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.974 | 32.754 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 260M | 385M | 68% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 2.09 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.57 | 37.81 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.43 | 56.47 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.13 | 17.58 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.06 | 111.14 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement