Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTCX vs GTCCX
FSTCX vs GTCCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTCX vs GTCCX
FSTCX vs GTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTCX vs. GTCCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTCX is a Hold and GTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTCX has more cash in the bank: 260M vs. GTCCX (82.4M). GTCCX pays higher dividends than FSTCX: GTCCX (9.55) vs FSTCX (2.35). FSTCX was incepted earlier than GTCCX: FSTCX (41 years) vs GTCCX (26 years). GTCCX (2.52) is less costly to investors than FSTCX (0.74). FSTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. GTCCX (13.00). FSTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTCCX: FSTCX (0) vs GTCCX (1000). FSTCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to GTCCX: FSTCX (500) vs GTCCX (250). GTCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.98 vs. FSTCX (15.57). GTCCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.90 vs. FSTCX (7.13).
| FSTCX | GTCCX | FSTCX / GTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.90 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.52 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.974 | 30.426 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Net Assets | 260M | 82.4M | 316% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 9.55 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.57 | 49.98 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.43 | 124.30 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.13 | 60.90 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.06 | 89.12 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement