Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTCX vs RYCSX
FSTCX vs RYCSX Comparison
Open Charts FSTCX vs RYCSX
FSTCX vs RYCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTCX vs. RYCSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTCX is a Hold and RYCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTCX has more cash in the bank: 260M vs. RYCSX (14.6M). FSTCX pays higher dividends than RYCSX: FSTCX (2.35) vs RYCSX (0.85). FSTCX was incepted earlier than RYCSX: FSTCX (41 years) vs RYCSX (25 years). RYCSX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSTCX (0.74). RYCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 159.00 vs. FSTCX (65.00). FSTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCSX: FSTCX (0) vs RYCSX (2500). RYCSX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSTCX: RYCSX (1000) vs FSTCX (500). RYCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.76 vs. FSTCX (15.57). RYCSX return over 5 years is better than : 43.30 vs. FSTCX (7.13).
| FSTCX | RYCSX | FSTCX / RYCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.38 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 2.43 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.974 | 25.625 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 260M | 14.6M | 1,781% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 0.85 | 276% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.57 | 56.76 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.43 | 105.05 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.13 | 43.30 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.06 | 108.86 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement