Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTCX vs RYMAX
FSTCX vs RYMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSTCX vs RYMAX
FSTCX vs RYMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTCX vs. RYMAX commentary
Sep 08, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTCX is a Hold and RYMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTCX has more cash in the bank: 242M vs. RYMAX (10.6M). FSTCX pays higher dividends than RYMAX: FSTCX (2.98) vs RYMAX (0.78). FSTCX was incepted earlier than RYMAX: FSTCX (41 years) vs RYMAX (28 years). RYMAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSTCX (0.74). RYMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 333.00 vs. FSTCX (65.00). FSTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYMAX: FSTCX (0) vs RYMAX (2500). RYMAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSTCX: RYMAX (1000) vs FSTCX (500). RYMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.74 vs. FSTCX (17.56). RYMAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.27 vs. FSTCX (14.25).
| FSTCX | RYMAX | FSTCX / RYMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.63 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.68 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.789 | 24.838 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 242M | 10.6M | 2,283% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.98 | 0.78 | 383% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.56 | 34.74 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.95 | 97.62 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.25 | 43.27 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.47 | 102.42 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement