Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTCX vs RYMAX
FSTCX vs RYMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSTCX vs RYMAX
FSTCX vs RYMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTCX vs. RYMAX commentary
Jul 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTCX is a Buy and RYMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTCX has more cash in the bank: 238M vs. RYMAX (12.1M). FSTCX pays higher dividends than RYMAX: FSTCX (2.54) vs RYMAX (0.77). FSTCX was incepted earlier than RYMAX: FSTCX (41 years) vs RYMAX (28 years). RYMAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than FSTCX (0.74). RYMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 333.00 vs. FSTCX (65.00). FSTCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYMAX: FSTCX (0) vs RYMAX (2500). RYMAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSTCX: RYMAX (1000) vs FSTCX (500). RYMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.93 vs. FSTCX (10.89). RYMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.83 vs. FSTCX (7.16).
| FSTCX | RYMAX | FSTCX / RYMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.64 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.69 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.638 | 19.404 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 238M | 12.1M | 1,967% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.54 | 0.77 | 330% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.89 | 40.93 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.78 | 90.11 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.16 | 40.83 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.96 | 97.51 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers