Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSTKX (2.74B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMEBX (1.00) vs FSTKX (0.56). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTKX (44 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). FSTKX (1.12) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). FSTKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.36 vs. RMEBX (8.73). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.28 vs. FSTKX (23.67).
| FSTKX | RMEBX | FSTKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.07 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.843 | 9.059 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.74B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.00 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.36 | 8.73 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.43 | 34.30 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.67 | 36.28 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.21 | 89.36 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers