Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMEBX
FSTKX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSTKX (2.81B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMEBX (0.99) vs FSTKX (0.53). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTKX (44 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). FSTKX (1.12) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). FSTKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.74 vs. RMEBX (8.96). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. FSTKX (25.72).
| FSTKX | RMEBX | FSTKX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.07 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.083 | 9.416 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.81B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.99 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.74 | 8.96 | 254% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.72 | 32.63 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.72 | 36.13 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.20 | 90.64 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers