Ad is loading...
FSTKX vs RMFCX
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$29.92
Change+$0.37 (+1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.47
Change+$0.51 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.18B
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.2B vs. FSTKX (1.45B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMFCX (1.34) vs FSTKX (0.90). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTKX (43 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.18 vs. FSTKX (-4.91). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.22 vs. FSTKX (41.62).
| FSTKX | RMFCX | FSTKX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.023 | -1.743 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 97.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.34 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.91 | 4.18 | -118% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.61 | 7.29 | -22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.62 | 56.22 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.98 | 56.90 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...