Ad is loading...
FSTKX vs RMFCX
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$31.32
Change-$0.03 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.99
Change-$0.12 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.86B
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMFCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. FSTKX (1.57B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMFCX (1.37) vs FSTKX (0.91). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTKX (43 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.39 vs. FSTKX (-2.48). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.82 vs. FSTKX (43.12).
| FSTKX | RMFCX | FSTKX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 43 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.725 | 1.050 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 101B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.37 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.48 | 4.39 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.72 | 17.27 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.12 | 55.82 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.03 | 60.49 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...