Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMFCX
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
Price$35.09
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.97B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.21
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. FSTKX (1.97B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMFCX (1.20) vs FSTKX (0.82). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTKX (44 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FSTKX (1.17) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. FSTKX (1.20). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.89 vs. FSTKX (39.68).
| FSTKX | RMFCX | FSTKX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.17 | 0.91 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.237 | 14.983 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.97B | 113B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.20 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.20 | 7.84 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.30 | 43.87 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.68 | 58.89 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.84 | 94.24 | 45% |