Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMFCX
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMFCX
FSTKX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSTKX (2.74B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMFCX (1.16) vs FSTKX (0.56). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTKX (44 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). FSTKX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). FSTKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.36 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. FSTKX (23.67).
| FSTKX | RMFCX | FSTKX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.91 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.843 | 9.137 | 184% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.74B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.16 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.36 | 8.88 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.43 | 34.84 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.67 | 37.23 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.21 | 91.06 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement