Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTKX vs RMFEX
FSTKX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FSTKX vs RMFEX
FSTKX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTKX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTKX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSTKX (2.81B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than FSTKX: RMFEX (1.41) vs FSTKX (0.53). FSTKX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FSTKX (44 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). FSTKX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FSTKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTKX: RMFEX (250) vs FSTKX (1000000). FSTKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.74 vs. RMFEX (9.45). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.25 vs. FSTKX (25.72).
| FSTKX | RMFEX | FSTKX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.62 | 160% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.62 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 44 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.083 | 9.694 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.81B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.41 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.74 | 9.45 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.72 | 34.42 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.72 | 39.25 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.20 | 100.56 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement