Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTLX vs RMEBX
FSTLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTLX vs RMEBX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value R6
Price$34.55
Change+$0.14 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.94B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
FSTLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTLX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. FSTLX (1.94B). FSTLX (1.06) and RMEBX (1.05) have matching dividends . FSTLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTLX (9 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSTLX (0.85). FSTLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FSTLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSTLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.54 vs. FSTLX (-2.83). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.54 vs. FSTLX (39.29).
| FSTLX | RMEBX | FSTLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.07 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.457 | 13.233 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.94B | 111B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 1.05 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.83 | 4.54 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.05 | 37.83 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.29 | 55.54 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement