Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTLX vs RMEBX
FSTLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTLX vs RMEBX
FSTLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTLX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTLX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSTLX (2.9B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTLX: RMEBX (0.99) vs FSTLX (0.76). FSTLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTLX (10 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSTLX (0.81). FSTLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FSTLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.37 vs. RMEBX (9.03). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.75 vs. FSTLX (29.47).
| FSTLX | RMEBX | FSTLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.07 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.509 | 10.367 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | N/A | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.9B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.99 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.37 | 9.03 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.55 | 38.30 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.47 | 35.75 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.62 | 90.55 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers