Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTLX vs RMFCX
FSTLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTLX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value R6
Price$34.77
Change+$0.18 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.92B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
FSTLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FSTLX (1.92B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTLX: RMFCX (1.24) vs FSTLX (1.03). FSTLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTLX (9 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSTLX (0.85). FSTLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). FSTLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FSTLX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. FSTLX (4.66). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. FSTLX (43.13).
| FSTLX | RMFCX | FSTLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.91 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.315 | 11.421 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.24 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.66 | 7.71 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.88 | 32.16 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.13 | 56.41 | 76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement