Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTLX vs RMFCX
FSTLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTLX vs RMFCX
FSTLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSTLX (2.75B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTLX: RMFCX (1.16) vs FSTLX (0.80). FSTLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTLX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSTLX (0.81). FSTLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FSTLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.94 vs. RMFCX (7.69). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. FSTLX (26.49).
| FSTLX | RMFCX | FSTLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.453 | 9.325 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | N/A | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.75B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.16 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.94 | 7.69 | 259% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.67 | 32.42 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.49 | 37.08 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.34 | 91.03 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement