Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTLX vs RMFCX
FSTLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTLX vs RMFCX
FSTLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FSTLX (2.7B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTLX: RMFCX (1.16) vs FSTLX (0.80). FSTLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTLX (10 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSTLX (0.81). FSTLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FSTLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.16 vs. RMFCX (9.55). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.00 vs. FSTLX (23.91).
| FSTLX | RMFCX | FSTLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.91 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.773 | 9.240 | 182% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | N/A | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.7B | 117B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.16 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.16 | 9.55 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.19 | 35.79 | 154% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.91 | 37.00 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.52 | 95.20 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers