Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTRX vs RMEBX
FSTRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTRX vs RMEBX
FSTRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FSTRX (2.65B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than FSTRX: RMEBX (1.04) vs FSTRX (0.61). FSTRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTRX (12 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). FSTRX (1.12) and RMEBX (1.07) have similar cost to investors . FSTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTRX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTRX (1500). FSTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.37 vs. RMEBX (9.11). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. FSTRX (20.88).
| FSTRX | RMEBX | FSTRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.07 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.910 | 6.308 | 205% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 117B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.61 | 1.04 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.37 | 9.11 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.55 | 34.37 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.88 | 34.74 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.66 | 94.33 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement