Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTRX vs RMFCX
FSTRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTRX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value A
Price$34.72
Change-$0.31 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.18
Change-$0.20 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.3B
FSTRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FSTRX (1.93B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTRX: RMFCX (1.24) vs FSTRX (0.80). FSTRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTRX (11 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FSTRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FSTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTRX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTRX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.96 vs. FSTRX (4.22). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.22 vs. FSTRX (43.84).
| FSTRX | RMFCX | FSTRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.215 | 12.767 | 104% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 110B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.22 | 7.96 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.15 | 32.87 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.84 | 60.22 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.89 | 93.48 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement