Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTRX vs RMFCX
FSTRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTRX vs RMFCX
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value A
Price$34.33
Change+$0.13 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.86B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.08
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.74B
FSTRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTRX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FSTRX (1.86B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTRX: RMFCX (1.26) vs FSTRX (0.81). FSTRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTRX (11 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FSTRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FSTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTRX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTRX (1500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.85 vs. FSTRX (3.21). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.88 vs. FSTRX (39.29).
| FSTRX | RMFCX | FSTRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.91 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.519 | 10.536 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.86B | 109B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.26 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | 6.85 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.93 | 23.64 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.29 | 55.88 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.64 | 88.18 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement