Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTRX vs RMFCX
FSTRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTRX vs RMFCX
FSTRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSTRX (2.74B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than FSTRX: RMFCX (1.16) vs FSTRX (0.56). FSTRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTRX (12 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). FSTRX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FSTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTRX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTRX (1500). FSTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.34 vs. RMFCX (8.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. FSTRX (23.56).
| FSTRX | RMFCX | FSTRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.91 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.91 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.853 | 9.137 | 184% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.74B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.16 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.34 | 8.88 | 218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.39 | 34.84 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.56 | 37.23 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.04 | 91.06 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement