Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTSX vs LZSMX
FSTSX vs LZSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSTSX vs LZSMX
FSTSX vs LZSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTSX vs. LZSMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTSX is a Buy and LZSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTSX has more cash in the bank: 2.98B vs. LZSMX (20.2M). FSTSX pays higher dividends than LZSMX: FSTSX (3.36) vs LZSMX (1.27). FSTSX was incepted earlier than LZSMX: FSTSX (17 years) vs LZSMX (29 years). LZSMX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FSTSX (0.01). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. FSTSX (37.00). FSTSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: FSTSX (0) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.91 vs. FSTSX (-0.82). LZSMX return over 5 years is better than : -4.94 vs. FSTSX (-6.49).
| FSTSX | LZSMX | FSTSX / LZSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.28 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.33 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.869 | 24.459 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.98B | 20.2M | 14,772% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 1.27 | 264% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.82 | 32.91 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.85 | 65.85 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.49 | -4.94 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.76 | 39.68 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers