Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTSX vs LZSMX
FSTSX vs LZSMX Comparison
Open Charts FSTSX vs LZSMX
FSTSX vs LZSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTSX vs. LZSMX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTSX is a Hold and LZSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSTSX has more cash in the bank: 3.26B vs. LZSMX (21.1M). FSTSX pays higher dividends than LZSMX: FSTSX (3.27) vs LZSMX (1.30). FSTSX was incepted earlier than LZSMX: FSTSX (17 years) vs LZSMX (29 years). LZSMX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FSTSX (0.01). LZSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 160.00 vs. FSTSX (37.00). FSTSX has a lower initial minimum investment than LZSMX: FSTSX (0) vs LZSMX (2500). LZSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.29 vs. FSTSX (3.85). LZSMX return over 5 years is better than : -2.35 vs. FSTSX (-2.58).
| FSTSX | LZSMX | FSTSX / LZSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.28 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.33 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.602 | 27.846 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.26B | 21.1M | 15,445% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 1.30 | 253% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.85 | 42.29 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.74 | 68.95 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.58 | -2.35 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.10 | 42.81 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement