Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTUX vs RMEBX
FSTUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTUX vs RMEBX
FSTUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FSTUX (3.8B). FSTUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSTUX (1.14) vs RMEBX (0.99). FSTUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTUX (40 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSTUX (0.94). FSTUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTUX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.65 vs. FSTUX (2.47). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.68 vs. FSTUX (22.84).
| FSTUX | RMEBX | FSTUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.946 | 8.448 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.8B | 117B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.47 | 4.65 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.63 | 34.88 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.84 | 34.68 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.32 | 92.45 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers