Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTUX vs RMEBX
FSTUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSTUX vs RMEBX
FSTUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTUX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSTUX (3.81B). FSTUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSTUX (1.17) vs RMEBX (1.00). FSTUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSTUX (40 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSTUX (0.94). FSTUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSTUX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.73 vs. FSTUX (5.14). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.28 vs. FSTUX (21.20).
| FSTUX | RMEBX | FSTUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.07 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.741 | 9.059 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.81B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.17 | 1.00 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.14 | 8.73 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.78 | 34.30 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.20 | 36.28 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.24 | 89.36 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement