Ad is loading...
FSTUX vs RMFCX
FSTUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTUX vs RMFCX
Invesco Dividend Income Investor
Price$25.30
Change+$1.44 (+6.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.23B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.56
Change+$3.33 (+6.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
FSTUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTUX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. FSTUX (3.23B). FSTUX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FSTUX (1.53) vs RMFCX (1.34). FSTUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTUX (39 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FSTUX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . FSTUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTUX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTUX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.43 vs. FSTUX (-7.86). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. FSTUX (27.02).
| FSTUX | RMFCX | FSTUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.489 | -7.697 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.23B | 98.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 1.34 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.86 | -4.43 | 177% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.01 | -0.65 | 1,078% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.02 | 45.42 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.07 | 46.29 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...