Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTUX vs RMFCX
FSTUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTUX vs RMFCX
Invesco Dividend Income Investor
Price$27.92
Change+$0.15 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.68B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.59
Change+$0.24 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.78B
FSTUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTUX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FSTUX (3.68B). FSTUX (1.33) and RMFCX (1.27) have matching dividends . FSTUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTUX (39 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FSTUX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . FSTUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTUX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTUX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.49 vs. FSTUX (7.59). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 62.06 vs. FSTUX (45.52).
| FSTUX | RMFCX | FSTUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.969 | 9.836 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.68B | 109B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.27 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 10.49 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.43 | 30.44 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.52 | 62.06 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.89 | 77.35 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement