Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSTUX vs RMFCX
FSTUX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSTUX vs RMFCX
FSTUX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSTUX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSTUX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSTUX (3.87B). FSTUX (1.15) and RMFCX (1.15) have matching dividends . FSTUX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSTUX (40 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). FSTUX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . FSTUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSTUX: RMFCX (250) vs FSTUX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.14 vs. FSTUX (5.79). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.70 vs. FSTUX (22.88).
| FSTUX | RMFCX | FSTUX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.609 | 10.454 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.87B | 118B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.15 | 1.15 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.79 | 9.14 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.00 | 38.82 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.88 | 36.70 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.77 | 92.27 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers