Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSUGX vs RGVBX
FSUGX vs RGVBX Comparison
Open Charts FSUGX vs RGVBX
FSUGX vs RGVBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSUGX vs. RGVBX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUGX is a Hold and RGVBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUGX (24B) and RGVBX (24B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSUGX pays higher dividends than RGVBX: FSUGX (4.29) vs RGVBX (3.31). FSUGX was incepted earlier than RGVBX: FSUGX (6 years) vs RGVBX (24 years). RGVBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than FSUGX (0.37). FSUGX (50.00) and RGVBX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSUGX (250) and RGVBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSUGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.44 vs. RGVBX (-1.42). FSUGX return over 5 years is better than : -1.68 vs. RGVBX (-6.33).
| FSUGX | RGVBX | FSUGX / RGVBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.32 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.32 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.498 | -2.157 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 24B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.29 | 3.31 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.44 | -1.42 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.89 | 8.73 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.68 | -6.33 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers