FSUGY
Price
$23.98
Change
+$0.46 (+1.96%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
45.07B
PLL
Price
$9.07
Change
-$0.09 (-0.98%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
256.53M
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSUGY vs PLL

Header iconFSUGY vs PLL Comparison
Open Charts FSUGY vs PLLBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$23.98
Change+$0.46 (+1.96%)
Volume$78.15K
Capitalization45.07B
Piedmont Lithium
Price$9.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.98%)
Volume$325.18K
Capitalization256.53M
FSUGY vs PLL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUGY vs. PLL commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUGY is a Hold and PLL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUGY: $23.98 vs. PLL: $9.07)
Brand notoriety: FSUGY and PLL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUGY: 64% vs. PLL: 59%
Market capitalization -- FSUGY: $45.07B vs. PLL: $256.53M
FSUGY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $45.07B. PLL’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $256.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the long-term than PLL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUGY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the short-term than PLL.

Price Growth

FSUGY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +9.35% price change this week, while PLL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

PLL is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUGY($45.1B) has a higher market cap than PLL($257M). FSUGY YTD gains are higher at: 6.389 vs. PLL (3.833). FSUGY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.99B vs. PLL (-18.36M). FSUGY has more cash in the bank: 2.64B vs. PLL (72.2M). PLL has less debt than FSUGY: PLL (1.57M) vs FSUGY (6.1B). FSUGY has higher revenues than PLL: FSUGY (17B) vs PLL (39.8M).
FSUGYPLLFSUGY / PLL
Capitalization45.1B257M17,549%
EBITDA9.99B-18.36M-54,395%
Gain YTD6.3893.833167%
P/E Ratio7.72N/A-
Revenue17B39.8M42,714%
Total Cash2.64B72.2M3,651%
Total Debt6.1B1.57M389,719%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUGY vs PLL: Fundamental Ratings
FSUGY
PLL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5054
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2997
SMR RATING
1..100
9195
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6084
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUGY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (33) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PLL (97) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FSUGY’s stock grew significantly faster than PLL’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (95) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (84) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as PLL (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to PLL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUGYPLL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PLL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DEMCX19.710.31
+1.60%
Macquarie Emerging Markets C
RYRAX49.610.53
+1.08%
Rydex Retailing H
IBALX34.270.20
+0.59%
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced A
ALGCX14.900.03
+0.20%
Alger International Opportunities C
FSIRX8.520.01
+0.12%
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Ret I

FSUGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUGY has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUGY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUGY
1D Price
Change %
FSUGY100%
+1.96%
BHP - FSUGY
73%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
RIO - FSUGY
72%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
FSUMF - FSUGY
68%
Closely correlated
+2.53%
VALE - FSUGY
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.94%
GLNCY - FSUGY
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
More