FSUMF
Price
$12.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
38.02B
54 days until earnings call
TLOFF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
319.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUMF vs TLOFF

Header iconFSUMF vs TLOFF Comparison
Open Charts FSUMF vs TLOFFBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$12.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization38.02B
Talon Metals
Price$0.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$517.32K
Capitalization319.37M
FSUMF vs TLOFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUMF vs. TLOFF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUMF is a Hold and TLOFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUMF: $12.65 vs. TLOFF: $0.28)
Brand notoriety: FSUMF and TLOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUMF: 30% vs. TLOFF: 47%
Market capitalization -- FSUMF: $38.02B vs. TLOFF: $319.37M
FSUMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $38.02B. TLOFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $319.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTLOFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TLOFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUMF is a better buy in the long-term than TLOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLOFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TLOFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FSUMF and TLOFF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FSUMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while TLOFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSUMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUMF($38B) has a higher market cap than TLOFF($319M). TLOFF YTD gains are higher at: 352.614 vs. FSUMF (10.000). FSUMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.5B vs. TLOFF (-3.49M). FSUMF has more cash in the bank: 4.9B vs. TLOFF (41.2M). TLOFF has less debt than FSUMF: TLOFF (176K) vs FSUMF (5.4B). FSUMF has higher revenues than TLOFF: FSUMF (18.1B) vs TLOFF (0).
FSUMFTLOFFFSUMF / TLOFF
Capitalization38B319M11,912%
EBITDA10.5B-3.49M-300,578%
Gain YTD10.000352.6143%
P/E Ratio11.53N/A-
Revenue18.1B0-
Total Cash4.9B41.2M11,900%
Total Debt5.4B176K3,068,182%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUMF vs TLOFF: Fundamental Ratings
FSUMF
TLOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2879
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10088
SMR RATING
1..100
6691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUMF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLOFF (37). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TLOFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUMF (100). This means that TLOFF’s stock grew similarly to FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's SMR Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as TLOFF (91). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TLOFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUMF (46). This means that TLOFF’s stock grew similarly to FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TLOFF (100). This means that FSUMF’s stock grew significantly faster than TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUMFTLOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OACCU10.56N/A
N/A
Oaktree Acquisition Corp III Life Sciences
BCRX8.27N/A
N/A
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals
PRTS1.09-0.01
-0.91%
CarParts.com
CMA68.86-1.74
-2.46%
Comerica
GFR5.09-0.16
-3.05%
Greenfire Resources Ltd

FSUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUMF has been closely correlated with FSUGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUMF jumps, then FSUGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUMF
1D Price
Change %
FSUMF100%
N/A
FSUGY - FSUMF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
RIO - FSUMF
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
BHP - FSUMF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
VALE - FSUMF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
TECK - FSUMF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.70%
More