FSUMF
Price
$12.65
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
38.02B
54 days until earnings call
VALE
Price
$10.40
Change
+$0.14 (+1.36%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
43.63B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSUMF vs VALE

Header iconFSUMF vs VALE Comparison
Open Charts FSUMF vs VALEBanner chart's image
FORTESCUE
Price$12.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.8K
Capitalization38.02B
Vale SA
Price$10.40
Change+$0.14 (+1.36%)
Volume$26M
Capitalization43.63B
FSUMF vs VALE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VALE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSUMF vs. VALE commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUMF is a Hold and VALE is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FSUMF: $12.65 vs. VALE: $10.40)
Brand notoriety: FSUMF: Not notable vs. VALE: Notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSUMF: 30% vs. VALE: 67%
Market capitalization -- FSUMF: $38.02B vs. VALE: $43.63B
FSUMF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $38.02B. VALE’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $43.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSUMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVALE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VALE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VALE is a better buy in the long-term than FSUMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSUMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VALE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSUMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VALE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VALE is a better buy in the short-term than FSUMF.

Price Growth

FSUMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.78% price change this week, while VALE (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSUMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

VALE is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VALE($43.6B) has a higher market cap than FSUMF($38B). FSUMF has higher P/E ratio than VALE: FSUMF (11.53) vs VALE (8.52). VALE YTD gains are higher at: 30.480 vs. FSUMF (10.000). FSUMF (10.5B) and VALE (10.5B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . FSUMF has more cash in the bank: 4.9B vs. VALE (2.92B). FSUMF has less debt than VALE: FSUMF (5.4B) vs VALE (20.3B). VALE has higher revenues than FSUMF: VALE (36.6B) vs FSUMF (18.1B).
FSUMFVALEFSUMF / VALE
Capitalization38B43.6B87%
EBITDA10.5B10.5B100%
Gain YTD10.00030.48033%
P/E Ratio11.538.52135%
Revenue18.1B36.6B49%
Total Cash4.9B2.92B168%
Total Debt5.4B20.3B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSUMF vs VALE: Fundamental Ratings
FSUMF
VALE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2825
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
6656
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUMF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as VALE (8) in the Steel industry. This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to VALE’s over the last 12 months.

VALE's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSUMF (100) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

VALE's SMR Rating (56) in the Steel industry is in the same range as FSUMF (66) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew similarly to FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as VALE (48) in the Steel industry. This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to VALE’s over the last 12 months.

FSUMF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as VALE (11) in the Steel industry. This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to VALE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSUMFVALE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
76%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSUMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VALE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEFD19.750.10
+0.53%
ETRACS Monthly Pay 1.5X Lvgd CE Fd ETN
UVIX11.550.02
+0.17%
2x Long VIX Futures ETF
KTBA20.65N/A
N/A
Structured Products Corp.
KNG50.06-0.04
-0.08%
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500® Dv Ast Tgt Inc ETF
DECT34.57-0.07
-0.21%
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 Dec ETF

FSUMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUMF has been closely correlated with FSUGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUMF jumps, then FSUGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUMF
1D Price
Change %
FSUMF100%
N/A
FSUGY - FSUMF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
RIO - FSUMF
44%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
BHP - FSUMF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
VALE - FSUMF
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
TECK - FSUMF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.70%
More