Advertisement
FSUMF vs VALE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUMF is a Buy and VALE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FSUMF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVALE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FSUMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- VALE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FSUMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VALE’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FSUMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- VALE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FSUMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +11.20% price change this week, while VALE (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.83%.
Reported Earning Dates
FSUMF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
VALE is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.20% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| FSUMF | VALE | FSUMF / VALE | |
| Capitalization | 45.1B | 51.9B | 87% |
| EBITDA | 9.99B | 15B | 67% |
| Gain YTD | 8.783 | 17.148 | 51% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.66 | 6.62 | 116% |
| Revenue | 17B | 40.7B | 42% |
| Total Cash | 5.22B | 2.92B | 179% |
| Total Debt | 6.1B | 16.4B | 37% |
FSUMF | VALE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 22 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 2 Undervalued | 7 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FSUMF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as VALE (7) in the Steel industry. This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to VALE’s over the last 12 months.
VALE's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Steel industry is in the same range as FSUMF (78) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew similarly to FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.
VALE's SMR Rating (51) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSUMF (90) in the null industry. This means that VALE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSUMF’s over the last 12 months.
FSUMF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as VALE (48) in the Steel industry. This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to VALE’s over the last 12 months.
FSUMF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as VALE (30) in the Steel industry. This means that FSUMF’s stock grew similarly to VALE’s over the last 12 months.
| FSUMF | VALE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 71% |
Advertisement
FSUMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUMF has been closely correlated with FSUGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUMF jumps, then FSUGY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSUMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSUMF | 100% | -1.81% | ||
| FSUGY - FSUMF | 68% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| RIO - FSUMF | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| BHP - FSUMF | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| VALE - FSUMF | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| FCX - FSUMF | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||