RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FSUMX (75.3M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FSUMX: RWMFX (1.41) vs FSUMX (0.95). FSUMX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FSUMX (3 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FSUMX (0.02). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSUMX (28.00). FSUMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: FSUMX (0) vs RWMFX (250). FSUMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.20 vs. RWMFX (2.09).

	FSUMX	RWMFX	FSUMX / RWMFX
Total Expense Ratio	0.00	0.31	-
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	0.02	0.31	6%
Fund Existence	3 years	24 years	-
Gain YTD	13.819	4.508	307%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	75.3M	218B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.95	1.41	67%
Returns for 1 year	20.20	2.09	969%
Returns for 3 years	77.15	30.24	255%
Returns for 5 years	N/A	27.39	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	82.36	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
FNNEX	86.20	0.31	+0.36%
American Funds New Economy 529-F-3
KMDVX	34.22	N/A	N/A
Keeley Gabelli Mid Cap Dividend A
QIACX	58.61	N/A	N/A
Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core IS
PSSMX	29.98	N/A	N/A
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index R3
PPYPX	10.80	N/A	N/A
PIMCO RAE International I-2