RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. FSUMX (70.4M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than FSUMX: RWMFX (1.42) vs FSUMX (0.97). FSUMX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: FSUMX (3 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than FSUMX (0.02). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. FSUMX (28.00). FSUMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: FSUMX (0) vs RWMFX (250). FSUMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.18 vs. RWMFX (7.53).

	FSUMX	RWMFX	FSUMX / RWMFX
Total Expense Ratio	0.00	0.31	-
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio	0.02	0.31	6%
Fund Existence	3 years	24 years	-
Gain YTD	14.853	6.626	224%
Front Load	N/A	N/A	-
Min. Initial Investment	0	250	-
Min. Initial Investment IRA	N/A	N/A	-
Net Assets	70.4M	218B	0%
Annual Yield % from dividends	0.97	1.42	68%
Returns for 1 year	26.18	7.53	348%
Returns for 3 years	82.27	34.20	241%
Returns for 5 years	N/A	29.34	-
Returns for 10 years	N/A	80.88	-

View a ticker or compare two or three

Ask AI

Compare

Interact to see
Advertisement

Interesting Tickers

MFs / NAME	Price $	Chg $	Chg %
		1 Day
VKSAX	18.81	0.19	+1.02%
Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Core A
DFISX	28.70	0.28	+0.99%
DFA International Small Company I
CIMDX	18.05	0.16	+0.89%
Clarkston Founders Institutional
TRNEX	50.25	0.44	+0.88%
T. Rowe Price New Era I
SPXKX	93.52	0.41	+0.44%
Shelton S&P 500 Index K