Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSUUX vs RMAGX
FSUUX vs RMAGX Comparison
Open Charts FSUUX vs RMAGX
FSUUX vs RMAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSUUX vs. RMAGX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSUUX is a Hold and RMAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUUX has more cash in the bank: 24B vs. RMAGX (12.9B). RMAGX (4.53) and FSUUX (4.38) have matching dividends . FSUUX was incepted earlier than RMAGX: FSUUX (6 years) vs RMAGX (16 years). FSUUX (0.30) is less costly to investors than RMAGX (0.26). RMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSUUX (50.00). FSUUX (250) and RMAGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.31 vs. FSUUX (-0.35). RMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 1.76 vs. FSUUX (-1.34).
| FSUUX | RMAGX | FSUUX / RMAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.26 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.26 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.439 | -1.207 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24B | 12.9B | 186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.38 | 4.53 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.35 | 0.31 | -113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.18 | 13.96 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.34 | 1.76 | -76% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.95 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers