Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSUUX vs RMAGX
FSUUX vs RMAGX Comparison
Open Charts FSUUX vs RMAGX
FSUUX vs RMAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUUX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. RMAGX (13.1B). RMAGX pays higher dividends than FSUUX: RMAGX (4.59) vs FSUUX (4.36). FSUUX was incepted earlier than RMAGX: FSUUX (6 years) vs RMAGX (16 years). FSUUX (0.30) is less costly to investors than RMAGX (0.26). RMAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FSUUX (50.00). FSUUX (250) and RMAGX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RMAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.43 vs. FSUUX (3.28). RMAGX return over 5 years is better than : 4.23 vs. FSUUX (1.70).
| FSUUX | RMAGX | FSUUX / RMAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.26 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.26 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.050 | 0.379 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.3B | 13.1B | 185% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.36 | 4.59 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.28 | 4.43 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.85 | 13.47 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.70 | 4.23 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement