Advertisement
FSV vs GTX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSV is a Buy and GTX is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FSV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FSV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- GTX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FSV’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FSV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GTX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FSV (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.07% price change this week, while GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -10.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.22%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.37%.
Reported Earning Dates
FSV is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
GTX is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (+0.85% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.31% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| FSV | GTX | FSV / GTX | |
| Capitalization | 7.45B | 2.37B | 314% |
| EBITDA | 379M | 600M | 63% |
| Gain YTD | -2.485 | 13.547 | -18% |
| P/E Ratio | 73.74 | 10.19 | 723% |
| Revenue | 4.34B | 3.89B | 112% |
| Total Cash | 188M | 259M | 73% |
| Total Debt | 1.42B | 1.69B | 84% |
FSV | GTX | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 51 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GTX's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSV (84) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSV’s over the last 12 months.
FSV's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as GTX (51) in the null industry. This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.
FSV's SMR Rating (63) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that FSV’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTX’s over the last 12 months.
GTX's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FSV (56) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to FSV’s over the last 12 months.
GTX's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSV (73) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSV’s over the last 12 months.
| FSV | GTX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 61% | 10 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WAESX | 17.55 | 0.16 | +0.92% |
| Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Investor | |||
| TRBCX | 191.16 | N/A | N/A |
| T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth | |||
| SPSDX | 17.34 | N/A | N/A |
| Sterling Capital Behav Sm Cp Val Eq C | |||
| JOHIX | 25.86 | N/A | N/A |
| JOHCM International Select Institutional | |||
| DBMZX | 28.79 | N/A | N/A |
| BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr Z | |||
FSV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSV has been loosely correlated with CIGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSV jumps, then CIGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSV | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| CIGI - FSV | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| CBRE - FSV | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| JLL - FSV | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| NMRK - FSV | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| CWK - FSV | 53% Loosely correlated | +2.09% | ||
More | ||||
GTX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with LKQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then LKQ could also see price increases.