FSV vs Z
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSV is a StrongBuy and Z is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FSV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FSV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- Z’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FSV’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while Z’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FSV’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
- Z’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FSV (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while Z (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +1.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.35%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +10.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +33.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.
Reported Earning Dates
FSV is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Z is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (+1.51% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
@Internet Software/Services (+10.69% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| FSV | Z | FSV / Z | |
| Capitalization | 7.45B | 11.2B | 66% |
| EBITDA | 379M | 104M | 364% |
| Gain YTD | -3.265 | -8.305 | 39% |
| P/E Ratio | 73.74 | 129.87 | 57% |
| Revenue | 4.34B | 1.95B | 223% |
| Total Cash | 188M | 2.81B | 7% |
| Total Debt | 1.42B | 1.83B | 77% |
FSV | Z | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FSV's Valuation (84) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as Z (84) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to Z’s over the last 12 months.
FSV's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for Z (81) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FSV’s stock grew somewhat faster than Z’s over the last 12 months.
FSV's SMR Rating (62) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as Z (90) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to Z’s over the last 12 months.
FSV's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as Z (52) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to Z’s over the last 12 months.
FSV's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as Z (99) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that FSV’s stock grew similarly to Z’s over the last 12 months.
| FSV | Z | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 63% | 9 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VLUE | 103.92 | 0.44 | +0.43% |
| iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF | |||
| FLV | 66.73 | 0.25 | +0.37% |
| American Century Foc Lrg Cp Val ETF | |||
| PCEF | 18.63 | 0.06 | +0.32% |
| Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | |||
| IVVM | 30.78 | 0.08 | +0.27% |
| iShares Large Cap Moderate Buffer ETF | |||
| GBUY | 33.80 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF | |||
FSV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSV has been loosely correlated with CIGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSV jumps, then CIGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSV | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| CIGI - FSV | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| CBRE - FSV | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| JLL - FSV | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| NMRK - FSV | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| MMI - FSV | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
More | ||||