Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWAX vs RNWBX
FSWAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FSWAX vs RNWBX
FSWAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FSWAX (44.4M). FSWAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FSWAX (0.68) vs RNWBX (0.41). FSWAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FSWAX (4 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). FSWAX (3.94) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). FSWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). FSWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FSWAX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FSWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.48 vs. RNWBX (18.14).
| FSWAX | RNWBX | FSWAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.66 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.94 | 1.66 | 237% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.085 | 12.082 | 208% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.4M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.41 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.48 | 18.14 | 256% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.26 | 39.22 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 9.30 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 97.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement