Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWAX vs RNWHX
FSWAX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts FSWAX vs RNWHX
FSWAX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. FSWAX (44.4M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than FSWAX: RNWHX (1.14) vs FSWAX (0.68). FSWAX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: FSWAX (4 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). FSWAX (3.94) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). FSWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). FSWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWHX: FSWAX (0) vs RNWHX (250). FSWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 46.48 vs. RNWHX (19.47).
| FSWAX | RNWHX | FSWAX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.72 | 208% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.94 | 0.72 | 547% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.085 | 12.651 | 198% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.4M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.14 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 46.48 | 19.47 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 82.26 | 43.67 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 14.04 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 107.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement