Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWCX vs RMEBX
FSWCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSWCX vs RMEBX
FSWCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSWCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSWCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. FSWCX (9.89B). FSWCX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSWCX (1.77) vs RMEBX (0.99). FSWCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSWCX (9 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSWCX (0.11). FSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FSWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSWCX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FSWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.33 vs. RMEBX (4.65). FSWCX return over 5 years is better than : 63.33 vs. RMEBX (34.68).
| FSWCX | RMEBX | FSWCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 1.07 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 1.07 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.383 | 8.448 | 300% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.89B | 117B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 0.99 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.33 | 4.65 | 588% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.02 | 34.88 | 212% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.33 | 34.68 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers