Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWCX vs RMEBX
FSWCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSWCX vs RMEBX
FSWCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSWCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSWCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. FSWCX (9.45B). FSWCX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSWCX (1.86) vs RMEBX (0.99). FSWCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSWCX (9 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSWCX (0.11). FSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). FSWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FSWCX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FSWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.38 vs. RMEBX (9.03). FSWCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.07 vs. RMEBX (35.75).
| FSWCX | RMEBX | FSWCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 1.07 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 1.07 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.643 | 10.367 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.45B | 118B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.86 | 0.99 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.38 | 9.03 | 336% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.51 | 38.30 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.07 | 35.75 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement