Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWCX vs RMFCX
FSWCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FSWCX vs RMFCX
FSWCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSWCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSWCX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FSWCX (8.49B). FSWCX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FSWCX (1.91) vs RMFCX (1.19). FSWCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FSWCX (8 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSWCX (0.11). FSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). FSWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FSWCX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FSWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.09 vs. RMFCX (10.10). FSWCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.24 vs. RMFCX (33.85).
| FSWCX | RMFCX | FSWCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.91 | 12% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.91 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.059 | 5.845 | 275% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.49B | 115B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.19 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.09 | 10.10 | 327% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.89 | 34.65 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.24 | 33.85 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 91.46 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement