Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWCX vs RMFEX
FSWCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FSWCX vs RMFEX
FSWCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSWCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSWCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. FSWCX (8.49B). FSWCX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FSWCX (1.91) vs RMFEX (1.45). FSWCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FSWCX (8 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than FSWCX (0.11). FSWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). FSWCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FSWCX (0) vs RMFEX (250). FSWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.09 vs. RMFEX (10.46). FSWCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.24 vs. RMFEX (35.97).
| FSWCX | RMFEX | FSWCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.62 | 18% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.62 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.059 | 5.987 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.49B | 115B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.45 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.09 | 10.46 | 316% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.89 | 35.96 | 175% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.24 | 35.97 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement