Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs GPGIX
FSWFX vs GPGIX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs GPGIX
FSWFX vs GPGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. GPGIX (349M). GPGIX pays higher dividends than FSWFX: GPGIX (0.93) vs FSWFX (0.79). FSWFX was incepted earlier than GPGIX: FSWFX (6 years) vs GPGIX (15 years). GPGIX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). GPGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSWFX (41.00). FSWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPGIX: FSWFX (250) vs GPGIX (1000). FSWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. GPGIX (6.81). FSWFX return over 5 years is better than : -2.71 vs. GPGIX (-31.23).
| FSWFX | GPGIX | FSWFX / GPGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.34 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.36 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.182 | 10.511 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 349M | 27,020% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.93 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 6.81 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.11 | 9.75 | 319% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | -31.23 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 31.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement