Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs GPGIX
FSWFX vs GPGIX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs GPGIX
FSWFX vs GPGIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. GPGIX (352M). GPGIX pays higher dividends than FSWFX: GPGIX (0.93) vs FSWFX (0.85). FSWFX was incepted earlier than GPGIX: FSWFX (6 years) vs GPGIX (15 years). GPGIX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). GPGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FSWFX (41.00). FSWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPGIX: FSWFX (250) vs GPGIX (1000). FSWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.19 vs. GPGIX (11.89). FSWFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.39 vs. GPGIX (-29.98).
| FSWFX | GPGIX | FSWFX / GPGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.34 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.36 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.982 | 11.364 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 352M | 25,994% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.93 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.19 | 11.89 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.98 | 15.00 | 293% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.39 | -29.98 | -1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement