Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs NAEFX
FSWFX vs NAEFX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs NAEFX
FSWFX vs NAEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. NAEFX (316M). FSWFX pays higher dividends than NAEFX: FSWFX (0.85) vs NAEFX (0.78). FSWFX was incepted earlier than NAEFX: FSWFX (6 years) vs NAEFX (11 years). NAEFX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). FSWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NAEFX (4.09). FSWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAEFX: FSWFX (250) vs NAEFX (3500). NAEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.88 vs. FSWFX (24.19). NAEFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.92 vs. FSWFX (0.39).
| FSWFX | NAEFX | FSWFX / NAEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.35 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.35 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.982 | 17.645 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 3500 | 7% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 91.5B | 316M | 28,956% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.78 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.19 | 29.88 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.98 | 35.06 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.39 | 4.92 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 119.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement