Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSWFX vs NALFX
FSWFX vs NALFX Comparison
Open Charts FSWFX vs NALFX
FSWFX vs NALFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSWFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. NALFX (307M). NALFX pays higher dividends than FSWFX: NALFX (0.99) vs FSWFX (0.79). FSWFX was incepted earlier than NALFX: FSWFX (6 years) vs NALFX (44 years). NALFX (1.10) is less costly to investors than FSWFX (0.76). FSWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NALFX (4.09). FSWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NALFX: FSWFX (250) vs NALFX (2500). NALFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.80 vs. FSWFX (14.13). NALFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.36 vs. FSWFX (-2.71).
| FSWFX | NALFX | FSWFX / NALFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.10 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.10 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.182 | 15.485 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 94.3B | 307M | 30,717% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 22.80 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.11 | 28.92 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.71 | 2.36 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 101.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IGE | 58.07 | 0.72 | +1.26% |
| iShares North American Natural Res ETF | |||
| RCLR | 50.61 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Reckoner BBB-B Clo Reinvesting ETF | |||
| JHS | 10.99 | N/A | N/A |
| John Hancock Income Securities Trust Capital Stock | |||
| RYLG | 24.46 | -0.16 | -0.66% |
| Global X Russell 2000 Cov Cl & Gr ETF | |||
| EWY | 168.02 | -15.50 | -8.45% |
| iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | |||